Saturday, July 26, 2008

Mad Men season 2 begins Sunday



I'm glad some of you actually read my blog and consider my recommendations. Unfortunately, not enough of you read to vote for my co-worker in the comcast teacher of the year contest, which she did not win. C'est la vie!

However, I have discovered that many of you are now hooked on licorice. The mango is so good. And the strawberry one is on sale at Target as we speak, so stock up but don't go to the Colma one, for I bought them all already.

Also, I'm glad that several of you are trying out Mad Men that quaint little show getting all kinds of critical notoriety. You'll be happy to know that the season 2 premiere is Sunday evening. If you have comcast on demand, you still have time to catch up on season 1.

Here's also the review from the SF Chronicle... I hope they don't mind...

Mad Men: Drama.

10 p.m. Sundays

on AMC.

In the first episode of the second season of "Mad Men," there's a great moment - in fact, many great moments - that immediately justify the runaway critical acclaim for this series while underscoring the primary mechanism for its brilliance, which is acute subtlety.

Don Draper (Jon Hamm), the central character in AMC's "Mad Men," and perhaps the only figure in prime-time television to be absolutely mired in existentialism, is at a bar, having a drink. This should come as no surprise, even to new fans interested in jumping on the heavily hyped, multi-Emmy-nominated drama, which starts Sunday. Drinking and smoking and stylized sets and clothes are the touchstones of the series and are frequently mentioned in the buzz that surrounds the show.

Almost none of the coverage for "Mad Men" explains that this is a show about interiors.

So Draper, the advertising executive at the heart of darkness that is this contemplative character study, is not out of place having a drink at midday.

But, as he's about to find out, he's out of place in the world. (He always has been - it's one of the primary drives in the "Mad Men" narrative - but Season 2 looks to be bringing this personal isolation into sharper focus.) Sitting at the bar with Draper is another man, perhaps slightly younger, reading Frank O'Hara's "Meditations in an Emergency," a collection of poems from the young, acclaimed poet. Don remarks that reading at the bar is a convenient excuse for not doing anything, not being at work. He barely hears the reply, which is a veiled swipe at the notion that doing something (like work) is even important.

"Is it good?" Draper asks the other man. "I don't think you'd like it," comes the reply. And there's an ever-so-faint look on Draper's face - the kind of nuanced acting that Hamm is rightfully getting credit for - he can't quite figure out whether he's been insulted or if it's merely the end of a conversation going nowhere between two disparate men.

But right in that moment, series creator and main writer Matthew Weiner has reset the hook on what's so alluring about Don Draper and "Mad Men." Times are changing. Men like Draper don't really know it yet, but the world has inched in a different direction from the way they are going. It's a wonderful scene, evocative of the nuances at the heart of "Mad Men." It's note perfect. Understated, undersold.

Out of place

Later Draper will be seen reading "Meditations in an Emergency," looking as if he's trying to understand some kind of coded text, some message he doesn't quite get. (No doubt copies will be flying off the shelves soon.) In some way, the poems are a message from the future - which is already surfacing in the New York that Draper walks through every day. And the insinuation is that despite his not being a man who values poetry - he's an adman, after all - there's something in the words that made a connection. At the end of the episode, part of one of the poems is voiced as Draper walks down the street looking, as always, out of place.

The first two episodes of "Mad Men" reaffirm its place in the upper echelon of television dramas. The writing is a real thing of beauty - from the aforementioned nuance to searing workplace witticisms and pitch-perfect tone from a multitude of characters. You can't overstate how accomplished "Mad Men" is at understanding the vagaries of dialogue among disparate characters.

So too is the acting. Hopefully "Mad Men's" subtlety will appeal to the new viewers expected to turn out in response to the series' rising profile. You don't find a lot of physicality in "Mad Men" - fights or guns or running or screaming fits. The series is mannered. The first season took place in 1960 for a reason: The country was still living in a 1950s-influenced time. The roiling decade ahead was in its nascent form. For the Don Drapers of the world, change was going to be what other people did, at least initially. The racism and sexism and old-school values and habits (which often form the basis for the best jokes in "Mad Men") were in their DNA.

Others at Draper's advertising firm, Sterling Cooper, are aware of the changes, but not the series' central character. Paul Kinsey (Michael Gladis), one of the copywriters at the firm, has grown a beard and started smoking a pipe, playing at being hipper than he really is. Even Draper's disaffected wife, Betty (January Jones), is feeling the cultural plates shift below her.

Kennedy era has begun

Weiner has smartly started Season 2 in 1962. John Kennedy is in the White House. A new era has begun. Draper is the core of the "Mad Men" universe. His worldview is beginning to be at odds (especially in advertising) with what is percolating up in the zeitgeist. He's only 36 and straddling two eras. Even in two episodes, you can tell that Weiner and company will be mining the change for all it's worth. When Joan (Christina Hendricks), the office manager at Sterling Cooper, goes to a would-be bohemian party that Paul throws, she sees that he's got an African American girlfriend and calls him out the next day in the office.

"You, out there in your poor little rich-boy apartment in Newark or wherever. Walking around with your pipe and your beard. Falling in love with that girl just to show how interesting you are." When Paul looks peeved, Joan adds casually, "Go ahead. What part is wrong?"

In perfect contrast, Draper is not playing at being someone other than himself or embracing change - mostly because he doesn't truly know who he is or where he fits. No doubt all around him will grapple at a quicker pace with what 1962 really means - his wife, his co-workers, the agency. His existential state might not yet be an emergency, but it's something Don Draper will have to meditate on, and that's going to make for compelling television of the smartest (and possibly most subversive) kind.

E-mail Tim Goodman at tgoodman@sfchronicle.com.



1 comment:

Anonymous said...

No offense, but none of your tv reviews to date have influenced me to watch more tv. Lifetime; Tori & Dean (don't ask me why); Oxygen (Snapped); Leave it to Beaver... that's all I have time for when I'm on the elliptical machine (at home).

But I will totally blame you for my recent purchase at Cost Plus. First of all, let me tell you that I was a (red) licorice lover long before your dad's sperm collided into your mother's egg. My favorites were Red Vines (sold individually) and Licorice Ropes. I didn't care too much for the shoelace string version. Hard to find were the other fruit flavored vines in different colors: green, orange & purple are the ones I remember, and if I had to guess the flavors they were apple, orange and grape but strictly artificially flavored.

There was none of this "gourmet" licorice like the kind you made me buy (out of curiosity of course).

So, there I was at Cost Plus when staring right back at me was a package of fancy licorice that looked an awful lot like the ones you decribed in your blog.

But Cost Plus was selling them for $2.99 a bag. So I circled the aisle a few times, retreated and advanced while deliberating should I - or should I?

Addictions run rampant in this family and I didn't want yours to become another one of mine.

So no thanks to you I bought a bag of the strawberry "liquorice" even though there were other flavors to tempt me. I was barely out of the parking lot when I tore open the bag, crammed one in my mouth and almost spat it out, disappointed. Why? Because it tasted TOO MUCH like strawberries. An acquired taste for someone who grew up on artificial flavorings.

But since I'm a firm believer in not wasting candy that cost as much as a piece of cheap meat, I gave it another try. And I'm sorry to say that I can only eat it sparingly.

One final note: it's better sucked on rather than chewed.